Quebec’s Crown prosecution office said it will not lay charges against a Montreal imam following comments he made at a pro-Palestinian rally last fall
In November, the RCMP confirmed to CTV News that it had opened an investigation into Adil Charkaoui(opens in a new tab) over a speech he delivered at a rally following the Israel-Hamas war. During the rally, he allegedly prayed to God to “take care” of the Israelis, according to a translation obtained by The Canadian Press
The RCMP’s Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET) led the investigation and sent the file to Quebec’s Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales (DPCP) to determine whether criminal charges should be laid against the man
On Thursday, the DPCP said in a statement that “after a rigorous analysis of the available evidence … it does not reveal the commission of a criminal offence.”
On Nov. 6, an official complaint was filed with Montreal police, who referred the case to the national police force. The complaint centred on remarks made on Oct. 14 and 28 of last year “in the context of the war between Israel and Hamas.
At the time, Premier François Legault called for the police to investigate(opens in a new tab), telling reporters, “It’s clear that this is incitement to hatred, to violence.” Opposition party leaders also accused the imam’s speech of crossing a line
The Criminal Code defines public incitement of hatred as making a statement in public that “incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace.”
The DPCP said Thursday that the complaint was reviewed by a panel of three criminal prosecutors, who concluded that “the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the words spoken constitute incitement to hatred against an identifiable group within the meaning of the applicable provision of the Criminal Code, as interpreted by the courts.”
“It is not the role of the DPCP to pronounce on the social acceptability of public speech, but rather to determine whether a criminal act has been committed. Given the independence of the DPCP from political considerations, the decision not to lay charges cannot be interpreted as taking a position in the current socio-political context,” the statement reads
Prosecutors must also be guided by the principle of a reasonable prospect of conviction when determining whether or not to lay a criminal charge, it said, adding that “each case submitted to the DPCP is analyzed rigorously and impartially.”
